A document to be registered, if not registered, is not admissible as evidence under Section 49 of the Registration Act. However, this unregistered document may be used as evidence of a secondary purpose, as provided for in section 49 of the Registration Act. A secondary transaction must be independent or divisible from the transaction that the law requires for registration. A guarantee transaction must be a transaction that should not be carried out by a registered document, i.e. a transaction that creates a right, title or interest in real estate worth one hundred rupees or more. If a document is inadmissible because of the lack of registration, none of its conditions can be admitted as evidence and the use of a document to prove an important clause would not be used as a secondary object. A document to be registered, if not registered, may be admitted as proof of a contract in a legal action for a given benefit. The Supreme Court recently upheld a court injunction that allows the plaintiff to conduct evidence of the unregord unsealed arrangement of the sale in his complaint for the recovery of the serious money paid by him at the time of the execution of the agreement for the sale. In light of the above, the contract for the sale of real estate in Uttar Pradesh must be a registered document. Section 49 of the Registration Act, as applicable in Uttar Pradesh after it was amended by U.P. Act 57 of 1976, provides that no document required by Section 17 or a provision of the Transfer of Property Act of 1882 or any other law in force at this time relates to all real estate in it. , or to be received as evidence of a transaction that infringes that property, confers that power or creates such a right or relationship, unless it has been registered.
In light of this provision, an unregreged agreement on the sale of real estate as evidence is inadmissible. It is concluded that, on the basis of the above Hon`ble Courts judgments, the unregured sales agreement was legitimized on the basis of the above Hon`ble Courts judgments. because it could be in a lawsuit for a defined benefit and under section 49 of the Registration Act. The non-registered sale agreement can form the basis of the legal action of a defined benefit and serve as evidence of the contractual agreement or partial performance of a contract. Section 53A should normally be used as a defence and not as a weapon when a defendant has the right to protect his property from the bearer or from his heir or his legal representative. 5. Where a document is not considered proof of non-registration, none of its provisions may be admitted as evidence and the use of a document to prove an important clause would not be used as an incidental. 3.